1 2025:CGHC:2174 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 278 of 2025 • Bhuneshwar Porte S/o Shree Shivnandan Porte Aged About 36 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Sankar, Block Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 3. Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 4. Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 5. Joint Director, Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 6. District Education Officer, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.). 7. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.). 8. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.). 9. Block Education Officer, Block Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 14/01/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records in related to the case of the petitioner from the possession of respondent for its kind consideration. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to consider the case of the petitioners for grant of benefits of Kramonnati Vetanmaan on completion of 10 years of services in light of the circular dated 10.03.2017 issued by the State Govt. and order passed by the Division bench in case of Smt. Sona Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh order dated 28.02.2024. 3 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to give all benefits of petitioner including the arrears of pay with 18% interest per annum from the date of completion of 10 years of services till the actual payment of Kramonnati Vetanmaan within the stipulated period of 30 days. 10.4 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to disposed off the instant writ petition with similar order passed in the case of Smt. Sona Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others in Writ Appeal No. 261/2023 order passed on 28.02.2024. 10.5 That, any other relief may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble Court deemed fit in facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. The claim of the petitioner is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman after completion of 10 years of their service. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue as such the petitioner is also entitled for first Kramonnati Vetanman and second Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents No. 2 & 3/competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 4 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to respondents No. /competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No.261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents No.2 & 3 /competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the respondents No. 2 & 3 to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 5. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat