HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7132 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1.The learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to advance any submission in spite of time having been granted to him on previous occasion to prepare his submissions. Therefore, the court proceeds to examine the records to ascertain the grievance of the petitioner with the assistance of Sri Pankaj Srivastava, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought a direction to the learned Additional District Judge-IV, E.C. Act, Lucknow to treat and consider the Original Misc. Case No.440 of 2019: State of U.P. and another Vs. Smt. Dhandei and another and Misc. Case No.248 of 2023: Dhandei and another Vs. State of U.P. and another as separate and independent proceedings and to expedite the hearing of Misc. Case No.248 of 2023 filed by the petitioners. 3. Copy of an application upon which the Misc. Case No.440 of 2019 has been instituted has not been annexed with the petition. In response to a query put by the court as to when or by which order both the aforesaid cases were linked together, the learned counsel for the petitioners responded that there is no order linking the cases together. 4. When the two cases mentioned in the prayer clause of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharmendra Nath Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Dhandei And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) petition have been linked together, there is no occasion for the petitioners to make a request to delinking the cases. 5. The learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has submitted that controversy involved in both the cases is interlinked and therefore both the cases are being proceeded together. 6. As the learned counsel for the petitioners has failed to place before the court the prayer made in the Misc. Case No.440 of 2019 the reason why both the cases are being proceeded together as also keeping in view the submission of learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel that the subject matter of both the cases are linked together and therefore both the cases are being proceeded together, there is no occasion for this court to pass any order for proceeding with two cases separately. 7. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. December 15, 2025 Ram. A227 No. 7132 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench