SAHADEV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/11104/2025 · 2025-12-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175394 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175394 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11104 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 17.10.2025 filed by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the Respondent No. 4 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the Respondent No. 4 / Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Mohanlalganj, District - Lucknow is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from date Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chitrangada Narayan, Shailendra Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Sahadev .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 1, 2025 Lokesh Kumar WRIC No. 11104 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench