Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17539 (MAD)

SURYA v. STATE REP BY

CRL OP/1911/2025 · 2025-01-28

A D Jagadish Chandira

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP NO. 1911 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-01-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP NO. 1911 of 2025 SURYA S/o. Elumalai, Muruganchery Village Thoruvallur Dstrict Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep By The Sub-Inspector of Police, TbJravallur Taluk Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.26 of 2025) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Sasikumar R V.Manimaran B.Sasikala S.Sathya V.Sangavi For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court. ORDER Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.26 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) and 109 of BNS, the present petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2. Pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner, false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court. He would submit that the petitioner is no way connected with the offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. 3. The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police, opposing for grant of anticipatory bail, is that due to previous enmity, a verbal altercation ensued between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. As a result, the petitioner, along with other accused, abused and assaulted the defacto complainant with their hands. He further submitted that the petitioner has eight previous cases pending against him. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that the petitioner has eight preivous cases, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 28-01-2025 Lpp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To 1. State Rep By The Sub-Inspector of Police, TbJravallur Taluk Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.26 of 2025) A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Lpp CRL OP NO. 1911 of 2025 28.01.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis