HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12926 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pankaj Patel, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 1 & 3, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. The present writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding the opposite party no. 2 to permit the petitioner to participate in counselling scheduled to be held for appointment process of assistant teacher (Science/ Math) in respect of Government order no. 2651 (1)/79-5-12-1 (04)/ 13 dated 11/07/2013 in compliance of order dated 29/01/2025 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP No. 18516 of 2019 as well as order dated 03/11/2017 passed by this Hon'ble Court in WRIA No. 27870 of 2017 as well as in pursuance to G.O. dated 19/07/2025, by extending the benefit of aforesaid orders passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Hon'ble Court, to the petitioner." Contention put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the schedule of counselling is fixed, which is appended at page no. 62 alongwith the writ petition. He submitted that prior to institution of the Special Leave Petition No. 18516 of 2019(State of U.P. Vs Neeraj Kumar Pandey and Others), the counselling was scheduled and the petitioner was called for, but, the proceeding of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Onkar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh Amit Bajpai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) appointment was stayed and the next time, the petitioner has not been called for counselling, schedule of which is annexed at page no. 62 of the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2/Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, U.P. Prayagraj, and the opposite party no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 2/ Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, U.P. Prayagraj within the period of one week from today and if such representation is moved, within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of two weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. November 6, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12926 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench