SMT. SHAKUNTALA SINGH v. APAR COLLECTOR, BARABANKI AND OTHERS
/7182/2025 · 2025-12-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175383 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175383 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7182 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Manuvendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Additional Collector, Barabanki, to decide Recall Application dated 20.07.2016, filed against order dated 19.07.2016, passed in Revision No. 1038 of 2006 (Computerized Case No. 2024530412000000207) - Smt. Shakuntala Singh Vs. Surendra Singh and Others, U/S 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Additional Collector, Barabanki, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Additional Collector, Barabanki, is directed to decide Recall Application dated 20.07.2016, filed against order dated 19.07.2016, passed in Revision No. 1038 of 2006 (Computerized Case No. 2024530412000000207) - Smt. Shakuntala Singh Vs. Surendra Singh and Others, U/S 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
December 15, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manuvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Smt. Shakuntala Singh .....Petitioner(s) Apar Collector, Barabanki And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench