SMT. HARSHITA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. AND ORS.
WRIA/14698/2018 · 2025-12-04
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175379 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175379 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14698 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 4, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Tripathi, Shobhit Mohan Shukla, Umeshwar Pratap Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Harshita Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench