[2025:RJ-JP:23186] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5812/2025 Lakshama Devi @ Likshama Devi W/o Danaram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Kachi Basti, Basdi, Hashampura, Ps-Bhankrota, District Jaipur City. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Sambhar Lake) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7614/2025 Mahaveer @ Mukesh S/o Shri Laxman, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bavariyo Ki Dhani Haripura, Police Station Narena, District Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Pareek Mr. Rahul Agrawal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V.J.) Order 13/06/2025 1. Both the bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.89/2025, registered with the Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 305(a) & 331(4) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:23186] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5812/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are behind the Bar since the date of their arrest. Counsel further submits that co-accused persons namely Pooran @ Phalo and Kabeer Khan have already been released on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.04.2024. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail applications. 5. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners so also the fact that the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court and to maintain parity, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, both the bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before the trial Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:23186] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5812/2025] 8. The Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in the connected case file. (GANESH RAM MEENA),(V.J.),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA/Satyendra/117-118