HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13037 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite parties to provide the pension along with all consequential benefits after included/added the service rendered by the petitioners under the capacity of daily wages as qualifying service, in terms of judgment dated 02.09.2019 passed in Civil Appeal No. 6798/2019 (Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others)" 3. It has been submitted that subsequently the aforesaid judgment has already been considered by this Court in the case of Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others, Writ-A No. 731 of 2024. 4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Chief Conservator Officer, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same, in light of judgment in the case of Jai Ram Sharma (supra), in case the same is applicable, within a period of six weeks, from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 11, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.P. Singh Somvanshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Heera Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Environment Forest And Climate Change Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench