SMT. VANDANA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKO.andORS.
WRIA/2425/2018 · 2025-11-26
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175334 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175334 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 2425 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 26, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijayendra Prakash Tripat, Vinay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Vandana .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench