MITHLESH KUMAR ALIAS MITHLESH MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5680/2025 · 2025-07-10
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17533 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17533 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:18685] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5680 of 2025
------ Mithlesh Kumar @ Mithlesh Mahto, aged about 18 years S/o Paltu Mahto, R/o Vill.- Kuchu, P.O.+P.S.- Ormanjhi, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Suresh Prajapti, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-10-07-2025
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.316 of 2025 arising out of Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.219 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61 (2), 112 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was found in possession of two stolen motorcycles. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that there is no theft report in respect of the said motorcycles. It is then submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.12.2024 as is evident from para-12 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused person, with similar allegation, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 17.04.2025 passed in B.A. No.2954 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned AJC-XVII, Ranchi in connection with S.T. Case No.316 of 2025 arising out of Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.219 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/