IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5219 OF 2025 Between: Chiligipalli Govindaraju, S/o Trinadharao, Aged about 47 years Occ Employee in BSNL R/o Visakhapatnam ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by the Public Prosecutor Hight Court of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravati. 2. Polamarsetti Karunakumar, S/o Late Balasowri R/o. D.No.3-140, Mangalapalem Kothavalasa mandal, Vizianagaram ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be The above-named petitioner seeks to present this Memorandum of Criminal Petition (Quash Proceedings) seeking to quash the Orders dt.05.03.2025 in Crl.MP.No.17 of 2025 in CC No. 148 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Kothavalasa, Vizianagaram District. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stgrted in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition the High Court may.be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 148 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Kothavalasa, Vizianagaram District This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/s.Mahathi Saaveri .Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (AP) on behalf of the Respondent The Court made the following: -fe APHC010239412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5219/2025 Between: Chiligipalli Govindaraju ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.MAHATHI SAAVERI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. \ \ 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.17 of 2025 in C.C.No.148 of 2016 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothavalasa. The petitioner is facing trial for alleged offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act. The petitioner has filed CrI.M.P., seeking leave of the Court to receive the 2 documents relating to the order of promotion and training program of the petitioner covering the period from 21.12.2015 to 26.02.2016. The contention of the petitioner that the petitioner was not served with the statutory legal notice during that period as he was not available at the address mentioned in the cause title and that he was undergoing training on 3. account of his promotion. The learned Magistrate has dismissed the petition vide order dated 05.03.2025. The paragraph 10 would clarify as to why the learned Magistrate has dismissed the petition. It is categorically held by the learned Magistrate that the petitioner had filed similar petitions since 14.12.2023 and that the present petition was another step towards dragging the matter relating to the year 2016. Under those circumstances, the petition was dismissed. This Court finds no valid grounds to interfere with the well considered order of the learned Magistrate and accordingly, the Criminal 4. Petition is dismissed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand SdA^yviNOD KUWIAR ASSISTANT REG STRAR 5. / closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Kothavalasa, Vizianagaram 1. The District 2. OneCCto M/s. Mahathi Saaveri, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CC s to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED :09/05/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.5219 of 2025 DISMISSING THE CRLP