UTTAM KUMAR SINGH RAJPOOT @ UTTAM SINGH RAJPUT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
NABAIL/589/2025 · 2025-11-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175327 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175327 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW .
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 589 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
3. Present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.0515 of 2024, under Section 111, 316(5), 318(4), 61(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, Police Station Tikait Nagar, District Barabanki.
4. Anticipatory bail application of the applicant with similar allegation has been rejected by this Court vide order passed today (03.11.2025) in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No.584 of 2025.
5. Thus, considering that on similar allegations, anticipatory bail application of the applicant has been rejected, present anticipatory bail application is also rejected on the same ground and reasoning as recorded in the said order. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shashank Shekhar Shukla, Amarendra Pratap Singh, Lalta Prasad Misra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Uttam Kumar Singh Rajpoot @ Uttam Singh Rajput .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. The applicant would be at liberty to apply for regular bail, if so advised, in accordance with law. November 3, 2025 nishant NABAIL No. 589 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench