ARPIT SHARMA v. UNION OF INDIA, THRU. SECY. OF FINANCES SERVIES MINISTRY OF FINANCE NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/10587/2025 · 2025-10-31
Shekhar B Saraf, Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175322 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175322 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10587 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has stated that the father of the petitioner had taken loan but due to death of his father, the petitioner being the legal heir of the borrower could not repay the loan as per the terms of the agreement. An order dated September 29, 2025 has been passed by the respondent-authority to which challenge has been made in the instant writ petition. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the amount due against him, in case he is permitted to do so in easy installments.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Bank submits that the Bank is ready to accept the amount, which is due as on September 26, 2025 i.e. Rs.10,28,000/-, if the petitioner deposits the same in monthly installments.
4. Upon hearing the counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and after considering the material on record, we are of the view that the appropriate direction should be issued.
5. Accordingly, we direct that the initial payment of 25% of the aforementioned due amount shall be made by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from date. The balance amount shall be paid by the petitioner in four equal monthly installments starting from Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dilip Kumar Pandey, Anurag Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Sudheer Tripathi Arpit Sharma .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India, Thru. Secy. Of Finances Servies Ministry Of Finance New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
December, 2025.
6. Till the period prescribed for depositing the aforesaid amount, the recovery proceedings against the petitioner will be kept in abeyance. However, we make it clear that in case the petitioner defaults in depositing the initial amount or thereafter the installments within the stipulated period, it will be open for the respondent-Bank to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. October 31, 2025 cks/- WRIC No. 10587 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench