MANOJ v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1197/2025 · 2025-10-30
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175312 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175312 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1197 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in Complaint Case No.3777 of 2010, under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Harpalpur, District Hardoi.
3. The Counsel for the applicant argues that the complaint case was filed alleging that the daughter of the informant was married to the brother of the applicant. Subsequently, the entire matrimonial family had killed her. The father-in-law and the mother-in-law have been enlarged on bail vide orders on record.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the fact that the applicant is the brother-in-law of the deceased and the mother-in-law and the father-in-law have been granted the benefit of anticipatory bail and prima facie, bald allegations have been levelled, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled for the benefit of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed . Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manoj .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Manoj be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 30, 2025 akverma ABAIL No. 1197 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench