APHC010239492021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13784/2021 Between: 1. YETRA VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O YALAMANDHAREDDY, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O D NO 4-366, YETRAVARIPALEM VILLAGE, KARLAPALEM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A. P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KARLAPALEM POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. GORREPATI NAGA MARUTHI, W/O MALLIKARJUNA REDDY, D-NO 10-21-07, PLOT NO- A10 MARG, RAMAKRISHNA ENCLAVE,TENALI, GUNTUR DIST. 5. GORREPATI MALLIKARJUNA REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN, D-NO-10- 21- 07, PLOT NO A10 MARG, RAMAKRISHNA ENCLAVE, TENALI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. S B SIVA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No 2 and 3 in not considering the complaint of the petitioners dated 06.03.2021 in providing police aid in implementing the orders of this Hon'ble court passed in WP no 20053 of 2020 dated 28.10.2020 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of pnnciples of natural justice and also violations of Article 14,16,19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent NO 2 and 3 to provide police aid in implementing the orders of this Hon'ble court considering the case of the petitioners.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaints lodged by Petitioner and the unofficial Respondents, several cases have been registered against each other. It is further submitted that, unless there is a specific direction from the Court, Police cannot provide police protection. 3. None represented for the Petitioner. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioner to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13784 of 2021 Dt.16.09.2025 Dinesh