Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.67 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Subhas Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. By means of the present criminal writ petition, petitioner seeks following reliefs:-
“(i) Issue a writ rule, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent nos.1, 2 & 3 to take appropriate action against the investigation officer of the First Information Report dated 30.11.2024 registered as FIR No.0501/2024, under Section 109(1), 115(2), 332(a), 351(3), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, Police Station Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar for not doing fair and impartial investigation and further to direct the respondent no.1, 2 and 3 to submit progress report in the FIR No.408/2022 (contained as annexure no.1 to this writ petition). (ii) Issue a writ rule, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.3 to transfer the investigation of FIR No.0501/2024, under Section 109(1), 115(2), 332(a), 351(3) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, Police Station Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar to some other competent Police Officer of any Police Station of the District Udham Singh Nagar except the police station Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar.”
4. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.02.2025 directed the learned State Counsel to seek instructions in the matter.
5. Today, on instructions, it is submitted by learned State Counsel that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted against the respondent nos.5, 7 & 8 under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 351(3), 3(5) of BNS on
17.02.2025.
6. Since the investigation has been concluded and the
2 charge-sheet has been filed, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in the writ petition.
7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, petitioner may avail the remedy under the appropriate law against the person for whom the charge-sheet has not been filed.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.03.2025 AK