Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1753 (AP)

SAATVIK ENGINEERING WPRS v. PEEYUSH KUMAR, IAS

CC/3510/2025 · 2026-04-16

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HN, J C.C.No.3510_2025 APHC010620022025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3510/2025 Between: 1. SAATVIK ENGINEERING WPRS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER BUTU GOWRINAIDU, S/O.BUTU LAXMI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. 1-82-11 LIG-117 GF, SECTOR 3, MVP COLONY, LB COLONY (PO), VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI KETAN GARG IAS, COMMISSIONER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to please to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the Hon hie High court for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 22.09.2025 passed in WP No.25903 of 2024 under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 HN, J C.C.No.3510_2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with filing of the Certified Copies of Orders of this Hon hie Court dated 22.09.2025 passed in WP No.25903 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) HN, J C.C.No.3510_2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:17.04.2026 NKA HN, J C.C.No.3510_2025 270 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3510 of 2025 Date: 17.04.2026 NKA