RAM YAGYA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/14626/2025 · 2025-12-17
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175289 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175289 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14626 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and Mr. Ashwani Kumar Singh Rathore, learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the opposite party No.3 and 4 to count the services of rendered by the petitioners on daily wage basis towards qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary benefits."
3. Mr. Ashwani Kumar Singh Rathore, learned State Counsel for opposite parties has however raised a preliminary objection that such benefits cannot be granted particularly with regard to pensionary benefits since petitioners are still in service.
4. From a perusal of memorandum of petition, it is evident that petitioners are still in service and therefore as of now, there is no question to grant of any pensionary benefits.
5. In view thereof, petitioners are granted liberty to approach this Court again in case their grievance is denied with regard to pensionary benefits subsequent to their superannuation.
6. With the aforesaid direction(s), petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Bhan Verma, Dilip Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ram Yagya And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench