Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175288 (ALL)

AKASH YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY COOPERATION GOVT. INDIA NEW DELHI AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/6376/2025 · 2025-11-19

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6376 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard Sri Sharda Mohan, Tewari,learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anand Dwivedi, learned counsel for the opposite parties and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :- "To issue a writ order or direction in the nature mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties concerned to regularize the petitioner presently working on the post of Accountant in Indira Gandhi Institute of Management, Lucknow forthwith;" Contention put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitled for regularization of his services, but, the opposite parties are not regularizing the services of the petitioner till date. After the aforesaid arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Secretary, National Council for Cooperative Training (NCCT), New Delhi and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has no Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharda Mohan Tiwari, Madhuri Bhushan Tiwari, Sakshi Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Anand Dwivedi Akash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Cooperation Govt. India New Delhi And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds for getting the benefit of family pension before the opposite party no. 3/Secretary, National Council for Cooperative Training (NCCT), New Delhi within a period of 10 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of two months, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. November 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 6376 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench