HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9157 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Smt. Sarojani Mishra and Smt. Pankaj Singh, Advocate have filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i) quash the impugned Charge Sheet No.-01/2018 dated 05.08.2018 in case No.953/2022 (State Vs Hariram & others) arising out of Crime No.- 0197/2018 U/s-147/323/504/506/427 IPC, Police Station Tikait Nagar, District Barabanki pending in the court of Additional District & Sessions Judge Court No.1 Barabanki, including entire proceedings initiated in pursuance thereof in terms of compromise dated 15.10.2025, contained herewith as Annexure No.1 to this petition. (ii) further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the entire proceedings of case No.953/2022 (State Vs Hariram & others) arising out of Crime No.-0197/2018 U/s-147/323/504/506/427 IPC, Police Station Tikait Nagar, District Barabanki pending in the the court of Additional District & Sessions Judge Court No.1 Barabanki, during the pendency of the petition, in the interest of justice." Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Kumar Pandey, Vineeta Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Chunnan And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 17, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 9157 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench