HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10278 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the application dated 25.07.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however, the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No. 5 i.e. Block Development Officer, Block Bhiti, Ambedkar Nagar should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 5 - Block Development Officer, Block Bhiti, Ambedkar Nagar is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awadhesh Kumar Srivastava, Rohit Shankar, Shohit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Motilal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Social Welfare And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 30, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 10278 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench