Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17527 (BOM)

BABA HAMID SHAIKH AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

ABA/779/2024 · 2025-03-03

Shri Arun R Pedneker

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 779.24ABA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 40 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO.779 OF 2024 BABA HAMID SHAIKH AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr.Amol A. Pawar h/f. Mr.Yunus Basheer Pathan APP for Respondent-State : Ms.Neha B. Kamble Advocate for Assist to P.P. : Mr.Y.B.Pathan ... WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3836 OF 2024 IN ABA/779/2024 ... CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 03.03.2025 P.C. : 1] Heard. For the reasons stated in Criminal Application No.3836/2024, the same is allowed. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. 2] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is arrested, therefore, the present application is rendered infructuous. 3] The learned APP, on instructions, submits that the applicant is not arrested. 2 779.24ABA 4] Be that as it may, since the submission of the applicant is that the applicant is arrested and he is not pursuing the matter, hence, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous. 5] However, this Court would not restore the application if it is found that the applicant is not arrested. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC