Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175269 (ALL)

SHAKEEL AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

/11858/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11858 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The accused-applicant is involved in Case Crime No.324 of 2025 under sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Laharpur, District Sitapur. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that only two case has been shown in the Gang Chart in which applicant has already been released on bail. Such bail orders are filed as Annexure 3 to the application. It has also been submitted that the applicant is not involved in any antisocial activities and he has been falsely implicated. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on merits, let the applicant Shakeel Ahmad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail 1. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalji Prasad Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shakeel Ahmad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) and pass orders in accordance with law. The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. 2. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 4. November 28, 2025 Sachin BAIL No. 11858 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench