Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17526 (KAR)

SRI B MOHAN v. SMT PUSHPALATHA

WP/21767/2019 · 2025-07-07

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24372 WP No. 21767 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 21767 OF 2019 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI B.MOHAN S/O LATE BALAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS EARLIER USED TO RESIDE AT NO.2, 9TH CROSS, AGRAHARA DASARAHALLI, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU-560 079 PRESENTLY R/AT MUNICIPAL NEW KHATA NO.1991/672/3549/23/3549/23, (OLD KHATA NO.672/3549/3549/23) OPPOSITE TO GOVERNMENT GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, PASHVALBDI NAGAR, SULIBELE ROAD, 22ND ROAD, 4TH DIVISION, DEVANAHALLI TOWN, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T.H.AVIN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT.PUSHPALATHA W/O MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 2. BABY JAHNAVI D/O MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.2 BEING MINOR IS REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN RESPONDENT NO.1 Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24372 WP No. 21767 of 2019 BOTH ARE R/AT NO.196/1, 4TH CROSS, A.G.DODDARANGAPPA ROAD, SRIRANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 085. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.P.MAHADEVA SWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND QUASH THE ORDER [ANNEXURE-D] PASSED ON IA NO.2 DATED: 08.02.2019 IN CRIMINAL MISC NO.627/2017 ON THE FILE OF III ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU AND CONSEQUENTLY REJECT THE SAID INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION FOR INTERIM MAINTENANCE FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS UNDER SECTION 125[1] OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is no more. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is no more, the writ petition is dismissed as abated. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20