SADARAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/8182/2025 · 2025-11-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175258 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175258 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8182 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.360 of 2024, under Section 65(1) BNS & Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Ahirauli, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. In terms of the FIR allegations were levelled that daughter of the informant was taken to the room by the applicant and was misbehaving when the people reached there and he ran away; no allegation of rape was levelled. In the statement under Section 180 BNSS, similar allegation was levelled. However, in the statement under Section 183 BNSS, the victim for the first time alleged that the applicant started doing something wrong. Medical do not corroborate the allegation. Tentative age of the victim is 15 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the huge variance in the statement not supported by the medical, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Sadaram be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nijam Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sadaram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 14, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 8182 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench