Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:25950 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1518 of 2025 Applicant :- Beena Pathak Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Jagmohan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant anticipatory bail application has been moved by the applicant for enlarging her on bail in Complaint Case No.2877 of 2016, under Section 138 N.I.Act, Police Station New Agra, District Agra. 3. Learned AGA has raised objection that the applicant has convicted under section 138 N.I.Act for six months and fine by order dated 30.03.2024. The applicant has filed revision against conviction order which is pending. Instant anticipatory bail application is filed against conviction order. It is submitted that the applicant is apprehensive of imminent arrest. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he would not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate with the investigation. 4. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. The applicant is not entitled for any indulgence by this Court. Hence, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant may be rejected. 5. Heard learned counsel for both the parties. Since instant anticipatory bail application has filed against conviction, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the applicant. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and considering the submissions advanced, the nature and gravity of the accusation, I find no good ground for anticipatory bail to the applicant in the aforesaid case. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant- Beena Pathak, involved in aforesaid case crime is, hereby, rejected. Order Date :- 24.2.2025 SKD Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad