( 2025:JHHC:18651 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5712 of 2025 ------ Kishtu Tuddu @ Kistu Tudu, aged about 23 years, son of Hirasan Tudu, resident of Talihari, P.O.-Alubera, P.S.- Amrapara, Dist.-Pakur … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate : Mr. Nishant Kr. Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 10.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Deodanr P.S. Case No.15 of 2025 (Special (POCSO) Case No. 36 of 2025) registered for the offences punishable under sections 64(2) (m)/89/351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 6 of POCSO Act. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner files the supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has repeatedly committed rape upon the victim. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the victim girl is a major lady and admittedly, the physical relationship between them continued for a considerable period of time and even the alleged victim became pregnant thrice. It is further submitted that at best it is a case of consensual sexual relationship between the parties. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.4 of the supplementary affidavit. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 21.03.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 16 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.S.J.-I-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Godda, in connection with Deodanr P.S. Case No.15 of 2025 (Special (POCSO) Case No. 36 of 2025) with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/