APHC010240232020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15811/2020 Between: KARRI KANAKA RAJU @ SUBBA REDDY, FATHER NAME .LATE RAJULU, AGE. 49, R/O.39-2-29, NEAR PUNJAB HOTEL JUNCTION,MURALI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICERCCS, II TOWN POLICE STATION VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, especially respondent no.3 herein in threatening the petitioner with dire consequences and harassing the petitioner by calling to the police station frequently thereby asking about the persons to whom the petitioner is not having any relation or connection and without any fault of the petitioner highhandedly and further threatening the petitioner that they would implicate in false cases as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, malafide, against to the violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner or his family members to the police station with unconnected 2 issue or interfere with the peaceful and enjoyment of the petitioner or petitioners family personal life.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that Police are not calling the Petitioner and his family members and not interfering with the life and liberty of the Petitioner. 3. Sri A.S.C.Bose, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to call the Petitioner and his family members, in the absence of any crime registered against them and not to interfere in the life and liberty of the Petitioner and his family members. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.15811 of 2020 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh