HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6433 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to respondents no. 2 to 4 is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the Consolidation Officer, Balrampur to decide the application dated 06.09.2025 filed by the petitioner under Rule 109(4) of U.P. Consolidation of Holding Rules 1954 in pursuance of order dated 01.04.2025 by which the parvana amal daramad has been issued by the consolidation officer Blarampur under rule109 of CH Act and same has been recorded in the revenue record and provide the possession for the same of Gata No. 29, Area 0.2520 hectares, 18 Area 0.717 & 348/6.0050 hectares, situated at Gram Ganeshpur & Gata No. 6/0.1570 hectare, 17/0.1430 hectares, 48/0.1580 hectares, 60/0.1580 hectares, 95/0.0067 hectares, 401/0.0630 hectares, 1029/0.2290 hectares situated at Gram Paraspur Kamda, Tehsil and District Balrampur, Sankata Prasad adopted son Ramrang. 4. It has been submitted that the petitioner has filed an application dated 06.09.2025 under Rule 109(4) of U.P. Consolidation of Holding Rules 1954 in pursuance of order dated 01.04.2025 by which the parvana amal daramad has been issued by the Consolidation Officer, Balrampur under Rule 109 of C.H. Act and the same has been recorded in the revenue record. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the order sheet clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. 4. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2025 and the trial courts are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kewal Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sankata Prasad .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer, Balrampur And Others .....Respondent(s) circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the revision which has been filed only in 2024. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 5. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner expeditiously. 6. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. . November 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6433 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench