IDREESH ALI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/9082/2024 · 2025-11-19
Rajeev Bharti, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175224 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175224 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9082 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made. Learned counsel for private opposite party no.4 is also not present whereas learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 19, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Singh, Mohd. Istkhar Ansari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Abhishek Shukla, Anil Kumar Shukla (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Idreesh Ali And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench