Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17522 (KAR)

SMT SRIDEVI S RAI v. BANK OF BARODA

WP/11737/2021 · 2025-01-08

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:596 WP No. 11737 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 11737 OF 2021 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SRIDEVI.S.RAI D/O H.DAYANANDA HEGDE, W/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.305, ELEGANT EMASSY NORTH, NEHARU NAGAR, YELAHANKA, UTTARAHALLI, BENGALURU NORTH. 2. K.KRISHNANANDA HEGDE S/ H.DAYANANDA HEDGE, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS , HOUSE NO.419, BEML LAYOUT, 17TH CROSS, BASAVESHWARA NAGARA, BENGALURU-560 079. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUDESH KUMAR ACHARYA.D.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANK OF BARODA (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING), (PREVIOUSLY VIJAYA BANK), NO.41/2, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. HAVING ITS BRANCH AT KUNDAPURA OF UDUPI DISTRICT, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:596 WP No. 11737 of 2021 REPRESENTED BY CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED OFFICER. 2. THE REGISTRAR, THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II, BENGALURU, AT LIC JEEVAN MANGAL BUILDING, NO.4, RESIDENCY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 025. 3. MR. H.DAYANANDA HEGDE AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE MONAPPA HEDGE, R/AT ASODU VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576 222. 4. MR. SHIVANANDA HEGDE AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, S/O H.DAYANANDA HEDGE, R/AT ASODU VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576 222. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Sudesh Kumar Acharya.U., counsel for the petitioners has appeared in person. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:596 WP No. 11737 of 2021 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the Sale Notice dated:10.02.2020 issued by respondent No.1 published in New Indian Express Daily Newspapers published on 11.02.2020 vide Annexure-Q. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. Suffice it to note that the Sale Notice is dated:10.02.2020. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The Sale Notice has spent itself. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 34