IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :::: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE MAY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. WRIT PETITION MQ: ^2261 HP N Between: Gottipati Janaradhana Rao, ‘ Residing at Beedidhi. Karnataka S/o Ramakotayya, Hindu, Aged 70 years, ...PetItioner/s AND 1- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary Department, Secretariat, Veiagapudi, Andhra Pradesh. Home 2. The Superintendent of Police Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Station House Officer, Denduluru Police Station Andhra Pradesh. Eluru District, 4. Gottipati Ramakrishna S/o Narayana, Age 65 D. No. 1-87, Challachintalapudi Village years. Cultivation, R/o Denduluru Mandal, Eluru District. ...Respondent/s Petition under Article 226 the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied therewith be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction of the Constitution of India P^'aying that in the High Court may more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in interfering in the civil dispute and harassing the petitioner by summoning to the police station on the behest of the 4*^ respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to not to harass the petitioner by summoning him to the 3'"' respondent’s police station in regard with the ongoing civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4*'^ respondent and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to not to interfere with the petitioner’s peaceful life and liberty by summoning him to the 3 respondent’s police station pending disposal of the above writ petition. rd Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: -- The Court made the following: r APHC010238972025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12261/2025 Between: Gottipati Janaradhana Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.12261 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home. 2. The grievance in the writ petition is that the 3'”'^ respondent repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station though there is no case registered against him. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the 4^^ respondent has filed a complaint against the petitioner and in that regard, the 3'"'^ respondent has called the petitioner for investigation purpose, disputes and as such, both the parties counselled to settle the dispute before the competent civil court. 4. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ' — 5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. However, it was found that there exists civil SD/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT RE9ISTRAR SECTIoiffciCER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to M/S PILLIX LAW FIRM, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCS to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies sree HIGH COURT DATED:07/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.12261 of 2025 a 0 8 SEP 2025 ntSectifjL rf' rrl Co ■at. CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS