APHC010239512008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: Between: L. Padmanabha Prasad Govt of A.P and others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PALLE SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V.DYUMANI (SC for TTD) The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 14.12.2004 passed by of 2004 in W.P.No.10550 of 2004. None represented for the petitioner. Smt.V.Dyumani, learned counsel for respondents record the order dated 03.12.2018 in Writ Petition No.10550 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1710/2008 ...PETITIONER AND ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: PALLE SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): V.DYUMANI (SC for TTD) The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 14.12.2004 passed by the Composite High Court in W.P.M.P.No.29590 of 2004 in W.P.No.10550 of 2004. represented for the petitioner. Smt.V.Dyumani, learned counsel for respondents, while placing the order dated 03.12.2018 in Writ Petition No.10550 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...CONTEMNOR(S) This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order Composite High Court in W.P.M.P.No.29590 while placing on the order dated 03.12.2018 in Writ Petition No.10550 of 2004, submitted that the main Writ Petition itself is dismissed as infructuous and there remains nothing for adjudication in the Contempt Case. Taking the submissions of learned counsel for the respondents into consideration, since the main Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous, the Contempt Case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 28.03.2025 MP 187 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO:1710 of 2008 Date: 28.03.2025 MP