VIPIN KUMAR (HEAD CONSTABLE PNO-112154279) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/13856/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175188 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175188 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13856 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner for transfer from Azamgarh to Gautam Buddh Nagar on compassionate ground since his wife serving in the same department is currently posted in Gautam Buddh Nagar.
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail administrative discretion, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Inspector General of Police (Establishment) Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 2, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pushpendra Kumar Sharma, Gurucharan Kashyap Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vipin Kumar (Head Constable Pno-112154279) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench