HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4821 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Learned AGA has filed short counter affidavit on behalf of the State today in Court, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief: "(a). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned History-Sheet No. 32-A, dated 16.12.2023, relating to Police Station-Mallawan, District- Hardoi, opened against the petitioner. (b). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to close the History-Sheet No. 32-A, dated 16.12.2023, relating to Police Station-Mallawan, District- Hardoi, and to stop the petitioner's surveillance, not to treat him as history-sheeter, not to harass, embarrass and humiliate him and his family members and not to make domiciliary visit at their residence and also efface the petitioner's name from the board of History-sheeter register, at Police Station- Mallawan, District- Hardoi. (c). issue any other suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem, fit, just and proper under the circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Brijesh Kumar Verma @ Tillu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) (d). allow the writ petition with costs." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though History- Sheet No. 32-A dated 16.12.2023 has been instituted against the petitioner, however, his case neither false in class- A nor class- B, as such, the entire exercise is bad in law. 5. Per contra, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the said prayer and has submitted that in respect of the grievance raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, he may prefer a representation before the appropriate authority, which shall be considered in accordance with law. 6. Having considered the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioner may prefer a representation before the appropriate authority/respondent No. 2 highlighting his grievance within two weeks. 7. If such representation is moved within the said period, the respondent No. 2 shall consider his representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 8. With these observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. November 7, 2025 KU CRLP No. 4821 of 2024 2 (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench