SIRAJ AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9664/2025 · 2025-11-18
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175152 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175152 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9664 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Sri Hari Prasad Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 3. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 4. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:-
"wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the charge-sheet No. 1 of 2020 dated 05-04- 2020 and cognizance order dated 11-06-2020 as well as entire proceeding of case no. 3772/2020 arising out of case crime no.78/2020, Under Section-323, 336, 504, 506 IPC. (State Vs. Siraj and Ors.), Police Station- Jaidpur, District-Barabanki pending before the Learned Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No.18, Barabanki contained as Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this petition."
5. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.SA1 to the application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Jabir Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Siraj And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 7. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 8. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 9.
For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 10. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 18, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 9664 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench