DHANDEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COMMISSIONER AND SECY. BOARD OF REVENUE LKO. U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/10663/2025 · 2025-11-04
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175149 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175149 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10663 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for State.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking mandamus commanding the respondents to decide the petitioner's claim application dated October 24, 2024 for payment of insured amount under the 'Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna'.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.
4. Learned standing counsel has no objection to the same.
5. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2/District Magistrate, Lucknow raising all her grievance, annexing therewith all the documents in support of her claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.
6. In case, such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Janendra Kumar Verma, Deepak Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dhandevi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko. U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.
8. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. November 4, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 10663 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench