PRATYAYA GUPTA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/10595/2025 · 2025-12-17
Divesh Chandra Samant
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175148 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175148 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10595 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
1. Sri Srees Kumar Srivastava, Advocate, put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No. 2 and filed vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Srees Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the chargesheet dated 01.05.2024 and cognizance/summoning order dated 16.07.2024 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Unnao in Case Crime No. 84 of 2024(State Vs. Pratyaya Gupta and others) under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 427, 336 I.P.C., Police Station-Gangaghat, District-Unnao. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that now parties have entered into compromise by way of compromise deed dated 04.11.2025, therefore, this Court may please to quash the proceeding for which learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 have no objection. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such, compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Trial Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Tiwari Shivani Subhash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pratyaya Gupta And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to The Court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it within two weeks, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within two weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the Trial Court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The Trial Court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For the period of one month, impugned summoning order dated 16.07.2024 and any process issued pursuant thereto, shall not be given effect qua the present application. 9.
Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 17, 2025 ADY A482 No. 10595 of 2025 2
(Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench