RAJBABU GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. GOVT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/11762/2025 · 2025-11-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175146 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175146 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11762 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.503 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of BNS and Section 3/4 (2) of POCSO Act, Police Station Gola, District Lakhimpur Kheri.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 14 years was missing. Subsequently, in the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the victim did not support the prosecution case and stated that she had gone with the applicant and have also married. There is no definite document with regard to the exact age of the victim.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the statements of the victim and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 03.09.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Rajbabu Gautam be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajbabu Gautam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 28, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 11762 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench