SANTRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO
/11292/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175140 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175140 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11292 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 433 of 2021, under sections 302 of 2025, P.S. Dargah Sharif, District Bahraich. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of informant aged about 38 years was married to the applicant and on 29.11.2021 she was beaten by the applicant by used of lathi, danda which resulted in her death. Post mortem report on record indicate presence of as many as 8 injuries which are also the cause of death. In the light of the said allegations learned counsel for the applicant argues that two of the 16 fact witnesses have been examined till date and the applicant is in custody since 4.12.2021 having no criminal history. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the pre trial detention suffered by the applicant of almost 4 years and the fact that 2 of the fact witnesses have been examined, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 4.12.2021 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of substantial pre trial detention. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Santram be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Kumar Mishra, Saurabh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Santram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 20, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11292 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench