APHC010240342021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13834/2021 Between: 1. KEERTI SAI LAKSHMI, W/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-95, A-SURAVARAM VILLAGE, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NATHAVARAM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. GADAM KONDAL RAO, , S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RIO GANDHINAGARAM VILLAGE, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. GADAM SATYANARAYANA, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 8 0 YEARS, R/O GANDHINAGARAM VILLAGE, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. GADAM BHADRAM, S/O KODNAL RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 2 RIO GANDHINAGARAM VILLAGE, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. GADAM NARSABABU, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O GANDHINAGARAM VILLAGE, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. P RAJESH BABU 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13834/2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in not providing the protection to the petitioner from the respondents No.5 to 8 while attending agriculture operations for the land in Sy.No.268/6, 268/7, 268/8 and 268/9 to an extent of Ac.1.01 cents, Ac.1.01 cents, Ac.1.01 cents and Ac.1.01 cents respectively situated at Srungavaram Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, pursuant to the endorsement dated 18.5.2021 of the 4th respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rcirespondent to provide protection to the petitioner from the respondent Nos. 5 to 8, while attending agriculture operations for the land in Sy.No.268/6, 268/7, 268/8 and 268/9 to an extent of Ac.1.01 cents, Ac.1.01 cents, Ac.1.01 cents and Ac.1.01 cents respectively situated at Srungavaram Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, pursuant to the endorsement dated 18.5.2021 of the 4th respondent and pass…” 2. None represented on behalf of the Petitioner. The present Writ Petition is of the year 2021. It appears that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the Writ Petition. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution. No order as to Costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.09.2025 UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13834 of 2021 Dated.19.09.2025 UPS 566