[2025:RJ-JP:22914] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5823/2025 Rambilas S/o Gokul, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Lasudiyagend Police Station Bhalta District Jhalawar(Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Aklera District Jhalawar(Raj) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.) Order 04/06/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 45/2025 registered at Police Station Aklera, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 8, 21 & 29 of NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that contraband was recovered by Rupchand and is less than commercial quantity. It is further submitted that petitioner is behind the bars since 20.04.2025 and conclusion of the trial will take considerable time and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. 4. I have considered the contention made by learned counsel for the parties with regard to facts and circumstances of the case. [2025:RJ-JP:22914] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5823/2025] A perusal of the case diary, the contraband was recovered from the Rupchand and upon the statement made by Rupchand the petitioner was implicated in the present FIR. The contraband is less than commercial quantity and Rupchand has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.1273/2025 vide its order dated 05.02.2025. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Rambilas S/o Gokul is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of the bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station in the 1st week of every month, till trial is concluded. If breach of any of these conditions, is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J Chandan/AVG/102