IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9927 of 2025 Date of Decision: 20.06.2025 _________________________________________________________ Ravinder Singh …...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide his case in light of judgment dated 07.07.2022 passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 842 of 2017, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Sardari Lal and another, in a time bound manner. 2. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, fairly states - 2 - that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide case of the petitioner in light of aforesaid judgment expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. June 20, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (shankar) Judge