Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17509 (ALL)

PADAM SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/2020/2025 · 2025-02-17

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23529 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2020 of 2025 Petitioner :- Padam Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jata Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State- respondents. 2. The petitioners have preferred the present petition inter alia with the following prayers:- "I. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3 to give all service benefit like A.C.P. selection grade to the petitioner no. 1 and to release the fund of husband of petitioner no. 2 alongwith family pension forthwith." 3. It is argued that the petitioner no. 1 is at the verge of retirement and will suffer a great monetary loss in case his service benefit are not given to him and the petitioner no. 2 is entitled for family pension but the same has not paid. Hence a prayer has been made to direct the respondent no. 3 to give all service benefit to the petitioner no. 1 and to pay family pension to petitioner no. 2 alongwith funds payable to her husband forthwith. 4. On the other hand, it is argued by learned Standing Counsel that in case, the petitioner will submit a representation before the respondent No.3/Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, Public Works Department, Mathura, he will pass appropriate orders in the matter expeditiously. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file a representation ventilating all her grievances before respondent No.3/Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, Public Works Department, Mathura, along with all relevant documents and papers on which the petitioner are making reliance and a certified copy of this order within a period of three weeks from today. In case, the representation is filed within the stipulated period, the respondent No.3 will pass appropriate orders most expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of representation. Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Arti Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad