Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175089 (ALL)

SHAYAM NARAYAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WPIL/1121/2025 · 2025-11-11

Subhash Vidyarthi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1121 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Ms. Shaista Parveen, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, Sri Vimal Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohan Singh, the learned counsel for the opposite party no.5/Gaon Sabha. 2. By means of the instant petition filed in public interest the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction for removal of encroachments over Gata No.127 measuring 0.0250 hectare, Gata No.123 measuring 0.0680 hectare, Gata No.124 measuring 0.063 hectare, Gata no.125 measuring 0.025 hectare and Gata No.126 measuring 0.0250 hectare situated in Village Haripur, Pargana Aldemau, Tehsil Kadipur, District Sultanpur. 3. On the basis of instructions, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has stated that proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code were instituted for removal of encroachments and the same are pending. 4. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of by issuing a direction to the authority concerned for disposal of pending proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code expeditiously in accordance with law. November 11, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shaista Parveen, Shailesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Shayam Narayan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench