- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2711 WP No. 15929 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 15929 OF 2019 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT MANJULAMMA W/O LATE MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, DIRECTOR, KUMBARARA SANGHA, NO.590, 8TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN, BANGARAPPA NAGAR, R.R.NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 098. 2. D.K.MANJUNATH S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, DIRECTOR, KUMBARARA SANGHA, NO.642, PUTTAGANAGUDI STREET, CHANNARAYAPATTANA ROAD, DEVANAHALLI TOWN, BENGALURU-562 110. 3. N.KRISHNA S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY, AGED 48 YEARS, DIRECTOR, KUMBARARA SANGHA, NO.387, BANASHANKARI II STAGE, UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 070. 4. N.MUNIKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED 52 YEARS, DIRECTOR, KUMBARARA SANGHA, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2711 WP No. 15929 of 2019 NARAYANAPURA, BETTAHALASURU, BENGALURU-562 157. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N.P.AMRUTHESH., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DY. REGISTRAR OF CO-OP SOCIETIES, ZONE-II, NO.146, 8TH CROSS ROAD, SAHAKARA SOUDHA, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003. 3. KUMBARARA SANGHA ®, NO.13, KALASIPALYAM NEW EXTN., BENGALURU-560 002. REP BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 & 2; SRI.JAI PRAKASH REDDY., ADVOCATE & SRI. GOUTHAM.A.R., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2711 WP No. 15929 of 2019 As could be seen from the Writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from six years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1