PRASHANT SINGH v. SRI PAWAN KUMAR SINGH, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL PATTI, DISTRICT PRATAPGARH AND ANOTHER
CAPL/3580/2024 · 2025-10-31
Manish Kumar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175060 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175060 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3580 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned counsel for State.
2. Learned counsel for State on the basis of instructions received from respondent has submitted that application preferred by the applicant under Section 460 of U.P. Revenue Code Manual has been decided and the entry has been made on 27.12.2024. Copy of the document has been provided to the learned counsel for applicant during course of the argument and the copy of the same is also submitted before this Court which is taken on record.
3. Learned counsel for applicant has fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
4. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
5. Notice, if any, stand discharged. October 31, 2025 Arti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hanumant Lal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Prashant Singh .....Applicant(s) Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Tehsildar, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench