Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175057 (MAD)

GOMATHI v. N.Ravikumar

CMA/1969/2025 · 2025-07-28

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMA No. 1969 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMA No. 1969 of 2025 1. Gomathi W/o. Late Chinnaraj, Res. at No. 6/96, M,Vellalapatti Village and Post, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Now Res. at Alapatti Village and Post, Krishnagiri Taluk and District. 2. Minor Monika D/o. Late Chinnaraj, Res. at No. 6/96, M,Vellalapatti Village and Post, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Now Res. at Alapatti Village and Post, Krishnagiri Taluk and District. Rep. by thier N.F.Mother/Gomathi. 3. Minor Venkataramana S/o. Late Chinnaraj, Res. at No. 6/96, M,Vellalapatti Village and Post, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Now Res. at Alapatti Village and Post, Krishnagiri Taluk and District. Rep. by thier N.F.Mother/Gomathi. 4. Minor Tharunika D/o. Late Chinnaraj, Res. at No. 6/96, M,Vellalapatti Village and Post, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Now Res. at Alapatti Village and Post, Krishnagiri Taluk and District. Rep. by thier N.F.Mother/Gomathi. Appellant(s) Vs https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1969 of 2025 1. N.Ravikumar S/o. Natarajan, No. 167/35, Koravandhalli Road, Marandahalli post, Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 2.The Branch manager United India insurance Co Ltd, Branch Office, Palacode Post and Taluk, Dharmapuri District. Respondent(s) PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act to set aside the order dated 22.10.2021 made in MCOP No. 764 of 2020 on the file of the MACT Special District Court for Motor Accident Claims Cases, Krishnagiri and thus render justice. For Appellant(s): MR.S.P.Yuaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Venkatachalam For R2 ORDER This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been listed before this Court under the caption ‘for being mentioned’ at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent submitted that as there is a huge delay in filing the appeal, it has been observed in the Order passed in the CMP.No.8964 of 2025, petition filed to condone the delay of 1032 days in filing the appeal, the appellants are not entitled to interest for https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1969 of 2025 the default period and the same is not incorporated in the judgment of this Court dated 28.07.2025. In view of the submissions, in the judgment of this Court in CMA.No.1969 of 2025, dated 28.07.2025, at the end of para 10, the following sentence shall be incorporated : “The appellants are not entitled to claim interest for the default period of 1032 days.” The registry is directed to incorporate above sentence and issue fresh Order copy to the parties concerned. 02-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No vrc https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1969 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. vrc CMA No. 1969 of 2025 02-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis