DILEEP YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/12111/2025 · 2025-12-04
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175051 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175051 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12111 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Santosh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 156 of 2025, under sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)m BNS, Sections 5(L)/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Pachpedwa, District Balrampur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of informant aged about 17 years was enticed by the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant and the victim had applied for marriage under Special Marriage Act and thereafter they were arrested. The tentative age of the victim is around 19 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that both of them applied marriage under Special Marriage Act, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 11.10.2025 and has explained his criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Dileep Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd.Mateen Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dileep Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 4, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12111 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench